Tugba Efendigil

Questrom School of Business, Boston University

A theorical model design for ERP software selection process under the constraints of cost and quality: A fuzzy approach


Journal article


Semih Önüt, T. Efendigil
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2010

Semantic Scholar DBLP DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Önüt, S., & Efendigil, T. (2010). A theorical model design for ERP software selection process under the constraints of cost and quality: A fuzzy approach. Journal of Intelligent &Amp; Fuzzy Systems.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Önüt, Semih, and T. Efendigil. “A Theorical Model Design for ERP Software Selection Process under the Constraints of Cost and Quality: A Fuzzy Approach.” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems (2010).


MLA   Click to copy
Önüt, Semih, and T. Efendigil. “A Theorical Model Design for ERP Software Selection Process under the Constraints of Cost and Quality: A Fuzzy Approach.” Journal of Intelligent &Amp; Fuzzy Systems, 2010.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{semih2010a,
  title = {A theorical model design for ERP software selection process under the constraints of cost and quality: A fuzzy approach},
  year = {2010},
  journal = {Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems},
  author = {Önüt, Semih and Efendigil, T.}
}

Abstract

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software selection is one of the most important decision making issues covering both qualitative and quantitative factors for organizations. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) has been found to be a useful approach to analyze these conflicting factors. Qualitative criteria are often accompanied by ambiguities and vagueness. This makes fuzzy logic a more natural approach to this kind of problems. This study presents a beneficial structure to the managers for use in ERP software vendor selection process. In order to evaluate ERP vendors methodologically, a hierarchical framework is also proposed. As a MCDM tool, we used analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and its fuzzy extension to obtain more decisive judgments by prioritizing criteria and assigning weights to the alternatives. The objective of this paper is to select the most appropriate alternative that meets the customer’s requirements with respect to cost and quality constraints. In the end of this study, a real-world case study from Turkey is also presented to illustrate efficiency of the methodology and its applicability inpractice.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in